Educational Capacity Strengthening for Risk Managment of Non-native Aquatic Species in Western Balkans - RiskMan

WP3 Implementation of Risk Management Model for Western Balkans

WP3 Implementation of Risk Management Model for Western Balkans

WP3: Summary of results

The risk posed by aquatic NNS is an emergence that must be taken under consideration. By a preliminary analysis, it emerged that in the WBs there is a lack of availability and accessibility of current policies and educational practices in the field of risk assessment of aquatic NNS species. Thus, the aim of the WP3 was to provide to the Western Balkan Partners useful tools to be able to comprehend the risk posed by aquatic NNS on economy, education, and public society.

In the first part of the WP3, the RiskMan Consortium carried out a deep literature review about the current knowledge on the risk management models within the framework of the concepts of NNS, risk management and the methods suggested to perform the best models. By this review it emerged that decision-support tools are essential instruments to the risk analysis of NNS because they assist in the identification (screening) and assessment of risks associated with NNS as well as providing support to decision-makers involved in their management.

Thus, using the modles and instruments available in the literature, the following decision tree was preliminary proposed to summarise to summarize the risk associated to the NNS in WBs.

 

 

FROM THEORY TO PRACTICE: RISK SCREENING AS THE FIRST STEP IN RISK ANALYSIS IN WBs

The first step in the risk analysis process is the screening of potentially invasive NNS, that aim to identify which species are likely to be invasive (and therefore require a comprehensive assessment of risks) and which are less likely to be invasive (and therefore are less likely to require detailed analysis). 

The RiskMan Consortium suggested an innovative double-steps approach for the implementation of Risk Management for all stakeholders by the integrative use of two different methodologies:

  • the Aquatic Species Invasiveness Screening Kit (AS-ISK) to assess the risk of invasiveness of NNS and
  • Maximum Entropy method (MaxEnt) used to investigate the potential distribution and habitat suitability and predict the distribution of aquatic NNS in WBs.

The integrated use of both methodologies was tested for some aquatic NNS selected from the databases of aquatic NNS for WBs developed within the WP2.

 

Double-steps approach for the implementation of Risk Management of aquatic NNS for WBs

1) Risk screening by AS-ISK

AS-ISK v.2.3 tool was used to assess the risk of invasiveness of some aquatic NNS in the study area. For the assessment, the AS-ISK thresholds for Basic Risk Assessment (BRA) and BRA + Climate Change Assessment (CCA) were given according to Vilizzi et al. (2021) (reported in the following Table 1)

 

Table 1: AS-ISK thresholds for Basic Risk Assessment (BRA) and BRA + Climate Change Assessment (CCA) according to Vilizzi et al. (2021).

 

 

Group

Thresholds

BRA

BRA + CCA

BRA Very High thresholds

BRA + CCA Very High thresholds

Fishes and Lampreys (freshwater) (temperate)

15.9

16.0

30

36

Fishes and Lampreys (marine) (temperate)

19.5

31.5

-

-

Invertebrates (freshwater)

13.25

25.75

30

36

Invertebrates (marine) (temperate)

15.1

15.6

30

36

Plantae (freshwater)

24.5

12.5

-

-

 

A total of 18 species, from each of the 3 Partner Countries (Albania, Bosnia and Herzegovina and Montenegro) and for the neighboard Program Balkans Countries (Croatia and North Macedonia) were selected (Table 2) and risk assessment was performed: 11 freshwater fish, 2 marine fish, 2 freshwater invertebrates, 2 marine invertebrates and 1 freshwater plant species.

 

Table 2: Summary of the 18 aquatic NNS selected for the AS-ISK assessments 

Group

Species

Area of risk assessment

Fishes and Lampreys (freshwater)

Ameiurus melas

Croatia

Fishes and Lampreys (freshwater)

Ameiurus nebulosus

Croatia

Fishes and Lampreys (freshwater)

Babka gymnotrachelus

Croatia

Fishes and Lampreys (freshwater)

Carassius gibelio

Croatia

Fishes and Lampreys (freshwater)

Lepomis gibbosus

Bosnia & Herzegovina, Croatia, Ohrid and Prespa lakes

Fishes and Lampreys (freshwater)

Neogobius fluviatilis

Croatia

Fishes and Lampreys (freshwater)

Neogobius melanostomus

Croatia

Fishes and Lampreys (freshwater)

Perca fluviatilis

Skadar lake (Montenegro)

Fishes and Lampreys (freshwater)

Perccottus glenii

Croatia

Fishes and Lampreys (freshwater)

Ponticola kessleri

Croatia

Fishes and Lampreys (freshwater)

Sander lucioperca

Albania, Bosnia and Herzegovina

Fishes and Lampreys (marine)

Lagocephalus sceleratus

Adriatic Sea (Montenegro)

Fishes and Lampreys (marine)

Pterois miles

Adriatic & Ionian Coastal Areas Albania

Invertebrates (freshwater)

Pacifastacus leniusculus

Bosnia and Herzegovina

Invertebrates (freshwater)

Physella acuta

Lake Ohrid and Lake Prespa (Macedonia)

Invertebrates (marine)

Callinectes sapidus

Adriatic Sea (Montenegro), Albanian coasts

Invertebrates (marine)

Rapana venosa 

Albanian coasts

Plantae (freshwater)

Elodea canadensis

Croatia, Lake Ohrid, Lake Prespa (Macedonia)

 

The results of the AS-ISK assessments for the 18 NNS in the WBs are summarised in Table 3. All the species were assessed as Highly invasive or Very High invasive.

 

Table 3: Summary of results of AS-ISK assessments

species

Area of assessment

Thresholds

Outcomes

BRA

BRA + CCA

BRA

BRA+CCA

Ameiurus melas

Croatia

43.0

53.0

Very High

Very High

Ameiurus nebulosus

Croatia

43.0

53.0

Very High

Very High

Babka gymnotrachelus

Croatia

18.0

26.0

High

High

Carassius gibelio

Croatia

39.0

49.0

Very High

Very High

Lepomis gibbosus

Bosnia and Herzegovina

29.0

41.0

High

High

Lepomis gibbosus

Croatia

30.0

40.0

Very High

Very High

Lepomis gibbosus

Ohrid and Prespa lakes

25-51

35-61

High

Very High

Neogobius fluviatilis

Croatia

30.0

38.0

High

Very High

Neogobius melanostomus

Croatia

42.0

52.0

Very High

Very High

Perca fluviatilis

Skadar Lake (Montenegro)

43.5

39.5

Very High

Very High

Perccottus glenii

Croatia

37.0

47.0

Very High

Very High

Ponticola kessleri

Croatia

30.0

40.0

High

Very High

Sander lucioperca

Albania

16-28

4-38

High

very High

Sander lucioperca

Bosnia and Herzegovina

31.0

37.0

Very High

Very High

Lagocephalus sceleratus

Adriatic Sea (Montenegro)

35.5

47.5

High

High

Pterois miles

Coastal Areas Albania

33-37

45-49

High

High

Pacifastacus leniusculus

Bosnia and Herzegovina

35.0

47.0

Very High

Very High

Physella acuta

Lake Ohrid, Lake Prespa

50.0

60.0

Very High

Very High

Callinectes sapidus

Adriatic Sea (Montenegro)

40.5

52.5

Very High

Very High

Callinectes sapidus

Albanian coasts

43

47

Very High

Very High

Rapana venosa

Albanian coasts

24-29

33-37

High

High

Elodea canadensis

Croatia

43

51

High

High

 

2) Potential ditribution model by MaxEnt

The Maximum Entropy method (MaxEnt) is one of the most widely used Species Distribution Model (SDM) algorithms relating species occurrence to corresponding environmental variables to estimate suitable habitats for a target species. MaxEnt was used to investigate the potential distribution and habitat suitability for some of the 18 aquatic NNS in WBs already used for the risk screening by AS-ISK tool and selected by the experts of the RiskMan team from the databases of aquatic NNS for WBs developed within the WP2 on the basis of the AS-ISK results (Table 4).

 

Table 4: List of species selected as example to run the MaxEnt models

Group

Species

Fishes and Lampreys (freshwater)

Lepomis gibbosus

Fishes and Lampreys (freshwater)

Sander lucioperca

Fishes and Lampreys (marine)

Pterois miles

Invertebrates (freshwater)

Pacifastacus leniusculus

Invertebrates (freshwater)

Physella acuta

Invertebrates (marine)

Callinectes sapidus

Plantae (freshwater)

Elodea canadensis

 

Prior to running the models, environmental data were recalculated using the “nearest neighbour interpolation” method to obtain the highest possible spatial resolution as showed in the following Figure 1.

Figure 1: schematic representation of the MaxEnt model for WBs

 

Models developed within RiskMan Project for the selected aquatic NNS in WBs

All the evaluated aquatic NNS showed a large probable expansion in temperate regions and mainly in Europe and the Western Balkans Region. Within the Mediterranean climate regions, these species could find suitable habitats to further spread.  

 

Lionfish (Pterois miles)

https://lh4.googleusercontent.com/ZpWAU12f8lLS5qvWfFVg9ElQ4D5MMTOJuO-eKBFn8f6Ax5KB-u6s5Mj7jjAsHi5mTeH-yYYi-UIvgyuBYPqjzjlJIh67rp26xT6Y_Y2I15X8QTAX-Xzvlho9rF2z4Q

Figure 2: Distribution of the suitable habitats for Lionfish at the world scale. 

 

Pumpkinseed (Lepomis gibbosus)

https://lh4.googleusercontent.com/Pe-zgDI9S04OL2U6WEtMw4edXdi9BhPZUXrsFD1frPvcjy49OwK_cLwN79ranV-_hATK7RUfNO6sKqm_SkIAV7V8dBSOw4PLrlsFWmI_GYtZ5fJybfnSQPFwss4xIw

Figure 3: Distribution of the suitable habitats for Pumpkinseed at the world scale. 

 

Canadian pondweed (Elodea canadensis)

https://lh5.googleusercontent.com/fTREvQF4RLrDmTw-B5EqpoffgLn6hWV-S0rrmysfJh8b33PEUuTpDUO4j9oxSPqXTHpPKvhPHQ7FAoXjUovsCxY81ZKxwWKHM-L8keqeaE6SJFZ5F8yEskHo8GRGuQ

Figure 4: Distribution of the suitable habitats for Canadian pondweed at the world scale

 

American signal crayfish (Pacifactacus leniusculus)

https://lh3.googleusercontent.com/_sug-yfxe_FLJvh1c4BrmCiOiwORb71lxX70Kbe1ib0ByBWwGw583nhS65JGbyKoy_GKCZlCpxVbA5D-fnrn317TnolWc0QfGLz21nstYrLXY3bzMCkgiIMj-isNcg

Figure 5: Distribution of the suitable habitats for American signal crayfish at the world scale. 


European perch (Perca fluviatilis)

https://lh3.googleusercontent.com/kpkarB7cmOArm3hZz-12ngUDuvW5TUPJ7w-5y0udyUwlTlTmaVIsZKW1vIJVfMJKHMw4jDVxaTXwtT5X-Nw22UxBITD_IOzOT4iKWHBM-oscquFIAcgmdFWU569v7Q

Figure 6: Distribution of the suitable habitats for European perch at the world scale. 
 

Acute bladder snail (Physella acuta)

https://lh5.googleusercontent.com/hq51fKixkT4qloQ8yb8CFmM045pADzMeFzU6RzbZlO1a1nUAYKUR_AVTTg3YIHPIHXpu8rGdpZankkQSN7ftNwOdpj2-cVCaydgW8sByHXaoo7e2XNZumD-_4snNpg

Figure 7: Distribution of the suitable habitats for Acute bladder snail at the world scale.

 

Pike perch (Sander lucioperca)

https://lh6.googleusercontent.com/sz5bFLoYtm2DwpjWkGlKp_8cCOSvUr-nsFEoo7O806EQzLapWhQNMNxxQW4WQPp3yTauGZgd8a5t82h_eaFvPK3VjYF9L3IaMnbA-q_D_wSU7EWDSeFaJgmXuJuriw

Figure 8: Distribution of the suitable habitats for Pike perch at the world scale.

 

Blue crab (Callinectes sapidus)

https://lh6.googleusercontent.com/Qkx5A_sYdgpOTHA7rHzAz1jO3Vw5S-S-VjvCirqlQudljZlJYSfSfT4dBh-i6rorsQXEl7uO-ErK3c-hJrle1dEE-sS4pta7Apg7tFwxgjm7M5dtRdy55OIKXyi5vw

Figure 9: Distribution of the suitable habitats for Blue crab at the world scale. 
 

 

As a conclusion of this test to the double use of MaxEnt and AS-ISK for the Risk Screening of NNS, both MaxEnt and AS-ISK gave riable results that can be useful to predict and assess the rish posed by aquatic NNS in the WBs. The combined use of these two methods can assist policy-makers, conservationists and managers to make reliable and well-informed decisions on the probable management measures in the near future.

 

Model for Risk Management of aquatic NNS in WBs 

The second part of the WP3 was dedicated to the proposal of a Model for Risk Management of aquatic NNS for the WBs.

Following the most widely suggested approach in the literature for Risk Management Process, the following 5 linear steps approach was selected:

  • Identify the Risk
  • Analyze the Risk
  • Evaluate or Rank (Prioritize) the Risk
  • Treat the Risk
  • Monitor and Review the Risk

 

By integrating the outcomes of the WP1, WP2 and WP3, and the education activities planned within the WP4 and WP5, the following Risk Management Model for Western Balkans Countries was proposed.